NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Wikipedia has barred citations of The Daily Mail after editors of the online encyclopedia concluded Wednesday that the British tabloid is "generally unreliable." The decision ...
Sorry, Daily Mail. It looks like the Wikipedia editors are kicking you off their site. The online encyclopedia made a rare move this week by classifying the British ...
Welcome to Source Notes, a Future Tense column about the internet’s information ecosystem. Sometimes (a lot of times?) the internal politics of Wikipedia mirrors its real-world counterparts. In ...
Wikipedia editors voted Wednesday to bar The Daily Mail as a source of reference in its entries, saying that the news website was “generally unreliable.” The editors said the vote in favor of the ban ...
Editors on Wikipedia have voted in favour of a soft ban the Daily Mail as a source for citations on its entries, branding output from the newspaper (specifically, but not exclusively, its website) as ...
Earlier this week The Guardian reported that Wikipedia editors had voted to “ban” the Daily Mail as a source for the online encyclopedia in all but exceptional circumstances and that the majority of ...
Save this article to read it later. Find this story in your account’s ‘Saved for Later’ section. Wikipedia built its encyclopedia empire (or, really, encyclopedia democratic republic) by ensuring that ...
There’s been a lot of recent debate about the tone and sourcing of articles on Wikipedia—just this week, doctors protested the encyclopedia’s labeling of acupuncture as pseudoscience. Now several of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results